Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: HBO's FAHRENHEIT 451 - More 1984 than Bradbury

  1. #1

    HBO's FAHRENHEIT 451 - More 1984 than Bradbury

    One thing that Writer-Director Ramin Bahrani and co-writer Amir Naderi had to deal with in their adaptation of Ray Bradbury's novel that the author didn't was the internet and a whole new world of digital communication. Neither did Francois Truffuat nor his co-writer Jean-Louis Richard in their acclaimed if problematic 1966 film. Of course, Bahrani could have done this version as a period piece, but, credit for not taking that way out of it. Unfortunately, this re-working has issues all its own.

    The very bare bones of Bradbury's book are still there: In an unspecified future, books are banned and firemen now start fires by burning those illicit volumes. Montag (Michael B. Jordan) is our fireman protagonist and Captain Beatty (Michael Shannon) his superior. Montag witnesses the torching of an old woman's (Lynne Griffin) massive library, during which Montag secretly steals a book (Dostoevsky’s Notes From Underground ) and begins to read. He meets up with a free-thinking woman Clarisse (Sofia Boutella) and she encourages his interest in reading. Eventually, Montag discovers an underground group of literate citizens who are fighting to keep books alive (they are called 'Eels' here).

    With that skeleton, Bahrani has fashioned a new version (this is a rare case where the term "re-imagining" actually applies). Unfortunately, he's created something that is more a futuristic Orwellian 1984 than a true FAHRENHEIT adaptation (there's even a citation of Winston Smith's vexing conundrum "2 + 2 = 5"; albeit the citation is via Dostoevsky not Orwell). In this future world, technology is still rampant, but the written word is used sparingly and replaced largely by pictures, symbols and emoji. In addition to books, it appears as if movies have also been banished, but, it's never clearly defined.

    Jordan and Shannon are fine actors, but, as was the case with SHAPE OF WATER, Shannon's presence is so over-powering that his supporting role ends up dominating (and diminishing) the lead. Shannon is one of our finest actors, but he risks being caricatured as the authority figure with a psychotic edge. Boutella and the supporting cast (including Khandi Alexander and Keir Dullea) are all fine, if largely shunted to the background. The production design and other tech credits are decent considering the cable budget with judicious choices in keeping the number of large locations to a minimum, although it must be said that the over-use of CGI flames borders on comical at times.

    It's fine for Bahrani to have re-imagined Bradbury's story as a futuristic 1984. What's not forgivable is that it's so often poorly thought out. Montag's wife from the novel has been eliminated, replaced by flashbacks to his childhood (a hoary cliche). There's an Alexa-like device called Yuxies which turns out to have Big-Brother-ish tendencies - or, does it? The movie doesn't clearly say. The movie retains Bradbury's Book People - but, then relegates their importance to the background in favor of a new construct called Omnis. More fundamentally, it seems as though the U.S. is the only country under this totalitarian rule. Other nations, including next-door neighbor Canada, are termed in Orwellian-speak -- "dark countries". But, if most of the world is free, then is Omnis even necessary? The bird is a nice tip of the cap to Bradbury's Phoenix imagery, but, it's little recompense for the dearth of deep thought that went into creating this new Fahrenheit world.

    Bahrani is a serious filmmaker (99 HOMES, GOODBYE SOLO) and he resists the urge to amp things up too aggressively, although there is an unnecessary chase or two towards the end. Sadly, that general temperance hasn't been matched by a logically-constructed visualization. It's a testament to the power of Bradbury's words that this FAHRENHEIT 451 still effects you if even in a small way. But, more likely, you will be moved to simply just re-read his novel (and maybe, check out Truffuat's 1966 version which, flaws and all, still has one of the most touching finales in cinema).
    Last edited by JoeS; 06-01-2018 at 05:52 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member The Silly Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Swedonia
    Posts
    3,276
    Issues indeed. Some very uneven acting (Michael B Jordan is quite poor, Shannon is good but as you say takes over way to much), some good if cliché Visuals of the future and the general impression that Bahrani does not really understand the finer Points of Bradburys novel. And as JoeS points out, some very strange plotholes. (Why mention the second civil war? Why would anyone in this future have any need to have knowledge of the first civil war or any other historical event? Why let people know that the rest of the world is free if you want to impose your totalitarian world view? )

    Still, if it gets someone out there to actually read the novel, then good. I very much doubt they achieve this though, as this film is quite bad science-fiction.
    Last edited by The Silly Swede; 06-02-2018 at 07:54 AM.
    "No presh from the Dresh!"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •