Never seen this but I came across the reference to it in Horace's review of Hush. Interested in background information. He says it was made for a 2-3,000. Without knowing anything about it that seems unlikely to me. Even more unlikely is Watkins claims that only $800 dollars of the budget actually went on the film, the rest on drugs. Anyone want to explain how that's possible for a film shot and post produced on 16mm? Impressive things are possible sometimes, like Rodriquez doing El Mariachi for 7000, but that's only because that film was post produced on video. The prints that circulate now were created and cleaned up Rodriquez with the help of a studios deep pockets. Watkins doesn't seem the most reliable source for information but I'd be interested to see a link to an explanation if such a thing exists.
Bookmarks